tg-me.com/clerk22/6940
Last Update:
الناس بتتخانق على الروايات العامية الأحسن ولا الفصحى
أنا:😇
BY كاتب مجهول
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/CT8A0NOit7mUwOlq4vP941Ie1U9vzR-23dAnFr7ci8Y22JPw4fnzJ1w60ywnJdkNVWB2MpML_3LBESmfCuWogryC8ykzuwefwhPeqNSIHP0jABMxdGDvjQ5HG-H6mrmJZ8ia94SFR23MwpoDPoubLBiMSLSnKJ6p5psA4CttWA3HBSKTO63t2FKfuDaKN-gcuaqydxOP_9UE6s6pQBgfZY6hAXbgmWKvIgVRy_0bOArC5VpvvlDvvBnzvkGfswHe-DT-mhYQDVKwvwSWrKUec3J1wl8X9TvFkNWniQv57ZUFVSEFZrZ4HMCS7h7XXVzAW08kl3-x9NQIFjHOrU1W0w.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/clerk22/6940
الناس بتتخانق على الروايات العامية الأحسن ولا الفصحى
أنا:😇
BY كاتب مجهول
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
كاتب مجهول from us